<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="todaycom/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Your Own Words - What Does Change Mean To You</title>
	<link>http://anotherlook.today.com/2009/07/04/in-your-own-words-what-does-change-mean-to-you/</link>
	<description>Just another Today.com weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://www.today.com/version-2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: scottystarnes</title>
		<link>http://anotherlook.today.com/2009/07/04/in-your-own-words-what-does-change-mean-to-you/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>scottystarnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://anotherlook.today.com/2009/07/04/in-your-own-words-what-does-change-mean-to-you/#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Obama's entire political career has been a set up. Now the media is finally on to him. You sound very whinnying, falsified and irrational for falling for Obama's magic and forked-tongue.

Where is this "change" you keep speaking of? Change in what? Like quadrupling the national debt? Growing government like never before? Taking over businesses like GM? Appointing all the czars, which is unconstitutional?

Change as in increasing 100% of everyone's taxes? Change as in trying to ruin our health care system by driving the private sector out with a government plan? Isn't this change bad for America?

How about the "change" in the Cap and Trade crap he so proudly wants. Have you read anything about this? Its a huge Energy Tax on everyone. The Congressional Budget Office has shot holes in every single one of Obama's "change" plans.

Instead of being whiny yourself, maybe you should check your sources of information. Just listen and read Obama's lips and you will see where all this anger is coming from. He has continued to say one thing while doing another.

I don't expect you to approve this comment because as a typical liberal you want to debate with emotions instead of facts. Your entire article is filled with name-calling tactics that most Liberals tend to use to combat factual statements.

John McCain is one of your targets. Funny that Obama attacked McCain on issues that he is trying to do now. For instance, Obama said it was "crazy to want to tax Americans health care benefits"...yet that is what he is going to do now. 

As for that retarded idea about the "general fund"..umm, we have that already...its called paying taxes. The sad fact is you just don't get it. You have Obama's magic in your eyes and refuse to wake up.

I could go on and on pointing out items in your article but it would be a waste of time. You simply cannot debate with facts. I enjoyed reading your opinion though..no matter how whiny it seemed. Want some cheese with that? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s entire political career has been a set up. Now the media is finally on to him. You sound very whinnying, falsified and irrational for falling for Obama&#8217;s magic and forked-tongue.</p>
<p>Where is this &#8220;change&#8221; you keep speaking of? Change in what? Like quadrupling the national debt? Growing government like never before? Taking over businesses like GM? Appointing all the czars, which is unconstitutional?</p>
<p>Change as in increasing 100% of everyone&#8217;s taxes? Change as in trying to ruin our health care system by driving the private sector out with a government plan? Isn&#8217;t this change bad for America?</p>
<p>How about the &#8220;change&#8221; in the Cap and Trade crap he so proudly wants. Have you read anything about this? Its a huge Energy Tax on everyone. The Congressional Budget Office has shot holes in every single one of Obama&#8217;s &#8220;change&#8221; plans.</p>
<p>Instead of being whiny yourself, maybe you should check your sources of information. Just listen and read Obama&#8217;s lips and you will see where all this anger is coming from. He has continued to say one thing while doing another.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t expect you to approve this comment because as a typical liberal you want to debate with emotions instead of facts. Your entire article is filled with name-calling tactics that most Liberals tend to use to combat factual statements.</p>
<p>John McCain is one of your targets. Funny that Obama attacked McCain on issues that he is trying to do now. For instance, Obama said it was &#8220;crazy to want to tax Americans health care benefits&#8221;&#8230;yet that is what he is going to do now. </p>
<p>As for that retarded idea about the &#8220;general fund&#8221;..umm, we have that already&#8230;its called paying taxes. The sad fact is you just don&#8217;t get it. You have Obama&#8217;s magic in your eyes and refuse to wake up.</p>
<p>I could go on and on pointing out items in your article but it would be a waste of time. You simply cannot debate with facts. I enjoyed reading your opinion though..no matter how whiny it seemed. Want some cheese with that? <img src='http://anotherlook.today.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


